Whats Up With the Lieberman Thing?

Seeing more Republicans endorsing Obama is always nice, but every single article – like the one below from the Financial Times – has to mention the idea of Joe Lieberman being a potential McCain running mate.

I really just don’t get it. McCain, from what I can see, still desperately needs to win over a big chunk of the social conservative segment of his party. How that is going to happen when one of his top advisors was Al Gore’s running mate?

Lieberman felt comfortable enough with Mr. Gore’s platform to accept the vice presidential spot on the ticket. If conservative Republicans are a group that John McCain wants to court and cement their support, should he be campaigning with someone who ran for Vice President of the United States on a platform that included:

• Support for a woman’s right to choose on the issue of abortion.
• Ensuring that new U.S. trade agreements to protect workers and the environment.
• Changing the political culture in Washington that puts the interests of the gun lobby ahead of the needs of American families.
• Expand access to high quality, affordable health care to all Americans, focusing first on our seniors and our children.
• Devote $115 billion of the budget surplus to create an Education Reform Trust Fund which will fund new education investments: including universal preschool.
• Commitment to never privatize social security or destroy it by diverting funds intended for social security. I will strengthen social security, not undermine social security.
• To raise the minimum wage – as much as needed, so work always pays more than welfare.
• Keep affirmative action; while rejecting numerical quotas.
• Eliminate ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’; let gays serve in army.

I know Joe Lieberman did not agree with everything Gore proposed but he agreed with enough of it to share a national campaign and ticket with Al Gore.

Foreign policy pulls in ‘Obamacans’

By Edward Luce by Washington
Published: August 12 2008 20:08 | Last updated: August 12 2008 21:17

Barack Obama on Tuesday netted the endorsement of three prominent Republicans, including Jim Leach and Lincoln Chafee, both of whom lost their congressional seats to Democratic opponents in the 2006 mid-term elections.

The announcement boosts the ranks of so-called “Obamacans” and is likely to fuel speculation about the possibility of bigger names – such as Colin Powell, former secretary of state, and Chuck Hagel, the Republican senator for Nebraska – also endorsing the Democratic nominee.

Describing Mr Obama’s call for change as “more renewal than departure” and thus in line with traditional conservative principles, Mr Leach said: “This is simply not a time for politics as usual . . . I have no doubt that a lot of Republicans will be attracted to Obama in spite of the flaws in this year’s primary process.”

The two Republicans, along with Rita Hauser, a former White House intelligence adviser, stressed foreign policy as their principal motivation for endorsing Mr Obama.

Ms Hauser described as “bellicose” the response of John McCain, the Republican nominee, to Russia’s conflict with Georgia.

Most “Obamacans” come from the so-called realist wing of the Republican party which has fallen into deep disenchantment with president George W. Bush’s foreign policy.

Some have also stressed their hope that Mr Obama would take a more aggressive approach to solving the Israeli-Palestinian crisis even though the Democrat has taken a strongly pro-Israel line. All said they supported Mr Obama’s pledge to talk to US adversaries, including Iran.

“There is a deepening split between the traditional Nixonian realist wing of the Republican party and the neo-conservatives that has become more pronounced with John McCain’s hardline anti-Russia rhetoric,” said Steve Clemons at the New America Foundation.

“I have good reason to believe that there will be other Republicans, such as James Baker [the former secretary of state], who may withhold endorsement from McCain rather than endorse Obama directly.”

Electoral analysts say there is unlikely to be a large switch of Republican voters, although Mr Obama’s endorsement by prominent Republicans could help sway independents into the Democratic column or encourage others to stay at home.

Mr McCain is working hard to win over hawkish Democrats to his camp, following his endorsement by Joe Lieberman, the former vice-presidential candidate, earlier this year.

There is a possibility that both Mr McCain and Mr Obama could choose running mates from opposition ranks in a bid for centrist voters. Mr Hagel is thought to be an outside choice for Mr Obama’s ticket and Mr Lieberman is on Mr McCain’s shortlist.